Explain why the cost of selection procedure does not necessarily mean more accurate predictions, as well as how to analyze whether a selection procedure is worth using.
What will be an ideal response?
It is not universally true that if a selection procedure costs more, it is a more accurate predictor of later job performance. Many well-intentioned operating managers commonly are misled by this assumption. Procedures add genuine utility to the employment process to the extent that they enable an organization to improve its current hit rate in predicting success (at an acceptable cost); however, success happens to be defined in that organization. Hence, the organization must assess its present success rate, the favorableness of the selection ratio for the jobs under consideration, the predictive ability of proposed selection procedures, and the cost of adding additional predictive information; then it must weigh the alternatives and make a decision.
You might also like to view...
Despite the best evidence rule, a party may generally offer a copy of a document in evidence unless:
A. It accurately reflects the contents of the original B. There is testimony offered to authenticate it C. The copy was made in anticipation of litigation D. There is evidence of bad faith or a genuine question of authenticity E. All of the above
Discuss the benefits of dying with a will
What will be an ideal response?
Barb owns a home in the city. She wishes to erect a water tower in her back yard to collect rain water. The city zoning ordinances limit the height of unattached structures to 28 feet. The tower will top off at 30 feet:
A. Barb will have to obtain a variance from the ordinance B. Barb will not be permitted to erect the tower under any circumstances C. Barb will have to sue the city for a writ of mandamus in order to erect the tower D. Barb may erect the tower, but only if she owns the property in fee simple. Fee simple rights are absolute
In a reported decision, the ____ contains the analysis and decision of the judge or judges that heard and decided the case, including a brief statement of the facts, a summary of the legal issues raised by the facts, the remedies sought, and, in appellate opinions, the errors of the lower court (if any), and the impact of the errors on the case's outcome.?
A. ?syllabus B. ?opinion C. ?headnote D. ?conclusion of the court