There are six constitutional limits on the criminal law. Which limit most often applies to obscenity laws and those dealing with loitering and vagrancy statues? Identify and define the constitutional limit and explain why it best applies
Answer: The void for vagueness doctrine is a constitutional doctrine based on the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution requiring that laws be written with sufficient clarity and specificity. Void for vagueness cases have historically fallen into two categories—those dealing with obscenity laws and those dealing with loitering and vagrancy statues. Several cases, including Winters v. New York and State v. Metzger address void for vagueness specific to obscenity laws. In both cases the courts declared the laws were too vague. Several cases have also dealt with the meaning of loitering and vagrancy statues. Students can cite examples such as Kolender v. Lawson andPapachristou v. City of Jacksonville. a. Result Crimes.
b. Conduct Crimes.
c. Harmful Crimes.
d. Tort.
B
You might also like to view...
When an inmate mother is allowed to keep her newborn in prison with her, the primary purpose is to provide opportunity for infant and parent to __________ —an important developmental step for the child
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
______ theory examines the link between social roles, stereotypes, and the self-fulfilling prophecy to explain criminality.
A. Labeling/shaming B. Critical/Marxist C. Peacemaking D. Individual trait
Which of the following is accurate concerning data acquired during field research?
a. qualitative data that is easily reduced to numbers b. quantitative data that is not easily reduced to numbers c. qualitative data that is not easily reduced to numbers d. all the data gathered must be reducible to numbers
One of the myths about policing is that
a. patrol is the backbone of policing b. single-officer patrols are most efficient c. hiring more police means more patrol officers will be on the street d. police create a phantom effect