Analyze the predicament of the French speaking people of Quebec
What will be an ideal response?
Assimilation and domination have been the plight of most minority groups. The French speaking people of the province of Quebec—the Québécois, as they are known—represent a contrasting case. Since the mid-1960s, they have reasserted their identity and captured the attention of the entire nation.
Quebec accounts for about one-fourth of the nation's population and wealth. Reflecting its early settlement by the French, fully 95 percent of the province's population claims to speak French compared with only 13 percent in the nation as a whole.
The Québécois have sought to put French Canadian culture on an equal footing with English Canadian culture in the country as a whole and to dominate in the province. At the very least, this effort has been seen as an irritant outside Quebec and has been viewed with great concern by the English-speaking minority in Quebec.
In the 1960s, the Québécois expressed the feeling that bilingual status was not enough. Even to have French recognized as one of two official languages in a nation dominated by the English-speaking population gave the Québécois second-class status in their view. With some leaders threatening to break completely with Canada and make Quebec an independent nation, Canada made French the official language of the province and the only acceptable language for commercial signs and public transactions.
In 1995, the people of Quebec were given a referendum that they would vote on alone: whether they wanted to separate from Canada and form a new nation. In a very close vote, 50.5 percent of the voters indicated a preference to remain united with Canada. The vote was particularly striking, given the confusion over how separation would be accomplished and its significance economically. Many French-speaking residents now seem to accept the steps that have been taken, but a minority still seeks full control of financial and political policies.
You might also like to view...
Emile Durkheim's study of suicide is considered a major work in sociology. Discuss Durkheim's findings regarding suicide, and how he explained that suicide was not just an individual act. What social factors or statuses did he find were related to suicide
How did Durkheim explain these relationships? Explain the forms of suicide that he identified, and how they relate to this model. What will be an ideal response?
All of the following are true of ethnocentrism except it ______.
a. has negative consequences b. is important to the maintenance of social solidarity and cohesion c. is a historical construct that has been declining since World War II d. involves the tendency to judge other groups, societies, or lifestyles by our standards
___________ is inserting donor sperm into a woman's body
A. Artificial insemination by husband B. Artificial insemination by donor C. Assisted reproductive technology D. None of these
Define sexual orientation:
a. the predominance of cognitive, emotional, and sexual attraction to individuals of the other sex b. the person does not identify as either male or female since they do not feel sufficiently like one or the other c. the belief that heterosexuality is superior to homosexuality d. classification of individuals as heterosexual, bisexual, or gay, based on their emotional, cognitive, and sexual attractions and self-identity