How do judges interpret the Constitution in different ways?
What will be an ideal response?
An ideal response will:
1, Indicate that some judges believe that courts should interpret the Constitution as the Framers wrote and originally intended it; the Constitution can be understood only by reference to its historical record.
2, Recall that other judges think of the Constitution as a document that changes over time; for these judges, the Constitution has no fixed or final meaning.
3, Explain that other judges prefer to concentrate on a literal reading of the Constitution's text; they focus on the actual words of the Constitution and what implications they have for the dispute at hand.
You might also like to view...
What is the least important variable explaining why some people vote and others do not today?
A. age B. gender C. race or ethnicity D. education
Which of these countries is the furthest from pure capitalism today?
a. Russia b. North Korea c. Singapore d. Saudi Arabia
Which of the following is a reason for U.S. policymakers choosing to privatize some public activities?
A. U.S. antigovernment ethos B. reliance on grant funding C. separation of powers D. culture of paternalism
In most instances,
A. criminal cases are tried in federal courts and civil cases are tried in state courts. B. both criminal cases and civil cases are tried in federal courts. C. criminal cases are tried in state courts and civil cases are tried in federal courts. D. both criminal cases and civil cases are tried in state courts. E. None of these answers is correct.