Explain how party nominations are made, and how the process has changed over time. Why did this process change?
What will be an ideal response?
Answer:
An ideal response will:
1. Explain that early party nominations were made by caucus or convention. The caucus was the earliest nominating process: party leaders would simply meet several months before the election and decide on the party's nominee themselves.
2. Differentiate this procedure from the more modern, and ostensibly democratic, convention nominating processes. Explain that party conventions used to be held at all levels of government. Local conventions nominated city or county officers, state legislators, or district representatives for the House of Representatives. State conventions nominated governors, U.S. senators, and state officers. State parties chose national convention delegates every four years to nominate a president. Today, state and local parties still hold conventions, but mostly to select party officers. They have little to no say over party nominees.
3. Assess the impact of progressive reforms in creating a primary election that democratized the electoral process while also weakening parties.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following principles did NOT shape the writing of the Constitution?
A) the pursuit of happiness C) separation of powers E) right of representation B) consent of the governed D) protection of liberty
Policy advocates aim to:
a. Prevent all social problems. b. Help citizens obtain their basic needs. c. Change social policy. d. Change electoral legislation.
A law passed by Congress and the adoption of a regulation by an agency are examples of which of the following?
a. interest groups b. red tape c. public policies d. public opinion
What aspect of the Japanese economy made it vulnerable?
a. a close relationship between government and business b. a substantial investment in new technology and research c. unfair trade practices that protected its business and industry d. the need to import raw materials