What can we know about an argument that has all false premises and a false conclusion?
a.) That it is valid
b.) That it is invalid
c.) That it is unsound
d.) Nothing yet
c.) That it is unsound
You might also like to view...
Suppose that two sets of data conform to a normal probability distribution, and that the standard deviation of Set X is 2, while the standard deviation of Set Y is 3 . Then,
A) Set X contains a larger amount of data than set Y. B) The curve for Set Y is more flattened and spread out than the curve for Set X. C) The variance for both sets of data will be the same. D) The curve for Set X is more flattened and spread out than the curve for Set Y. E) Set Y contains a larger amount of data than set X.
Freya is gambling. You say: "If you multiply your possible gain by your chance of winning, you'll see that it's not worth it to gamble this money." She puts down another bet and says: maybe, but think of how great it would be if I won? Freya is most obviously exhibiting:
A. the diminishing marginal utility of money B. the endowment effect C. honoring sunk costs D. the possibility effect
The word “deontology” means ___________
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
What are people naturally like, according to Thomas Hobbes?
What will be an ideal response?