In Oliveras v. State, the court held that?
A. ?robbery must be defined as a specific intent offense if it is used to support a charge of felony murder, and several of the jury instructions were erroneous; therefore, the cumulative effect was that Oliveras's convictions should be reversed.
B. ?there was insufficient evidence that Oliveras agreed to murder Mendez-Rodriguez with Zambada, aided Zambada in the murder, and took property from Mendez-Rodriguez.
C. ?it would follow the rule of lenity and find that the robbery did not supply intent sufficient to hold Oliveras liable for murder under the felony-murder rule.
D. ?there was sufficient evidence that Oliveras aided with the murder and robbed the victim to support his convictions, and the court disagreed with Oliveras's assertion that robbery must be defined as a specific intent offense if it is used to support a charge of felony murder.
Answer: D
You might also like to view...
?It is a crime to use which of the following to defraud?
A. ?Radio B. ?Television C. ?The Internet D. ?All of these choices are correct.
If a personal representative fails to file the proper forms in a timely manner, he or she will be held personally liable for any interest and penalties assessed by the Internal Revenue Service
a. True b. False
When introducing statutory law in the analysis section, include only the relevant portions of the law.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
There is no required format for a memorandum of law
Indicate whether the statement is true or false