In an argument relating to fixing prices for goods, Nathan, the sales manager of Expa Manufacturing Inc., argues that the company will charge 25% more than its previous price because Leon Manufacturing, Expa Manufacturing’s sister company, charges more for its goods. This scenario exemplifies _____.
a. arguing from analogy
b. arguing from causation
c. arguing from sign
d. arguing from theory
a. arguing from analogy
This scenario exemplifies arguing from analogy. Arguing from analogy supports a claim with a single comparable example that is significantly similar to the subject of the claim. The general warrant for reasoning from analogy is "What is true for situation A will also be true in situation B, which is similar to situation A" or "What is true for situation A will be true in all similar situations."
You might also like to view...
This organization held the trump card in RCA:
a. Westinghouse b. General Electric c. American Marconi d. AT&T e.United Fruit Company
Define paraphrase.
What will be an ideal response?
Some journalists recommend that research time should be two times the actual interview.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
A group member who has had serious problems with past groups is probably in which of the following stages of group socialization?
A. assimilation B. antecedent C. anticipatory D. exit E. encounter