Distinguish between a bright-line decision and case-by-case adjudication
What will be an ideal response?
A bright-line decision is one in which the Court hands down a specific rule that is meant to be applied uniformly in every case, with very little interpretation. It is like the metaphorical "line drawn in the sand" in which the Court emphatically communicates to the criminal justice community what it can and cannot do.
A decision requiring case-by-case adjudication is quite different. In these types of rulings, the Supreme Court often refers to the concept of totality of circumstances. This means that all the facts and circumstances surrounding the case must be examined in order to determine whether a constitutional rights violation has taken place. Deciding whether the totality of circumstances supports the action in question requires looking at each case individually.
You might also like to view...
Ordinary mailing envelopes should not be used as evidence containers
a. True b. False
The symptoms of crime are focused on in POP, while searching for root causes are avoided
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
After being kicked out of school, Tom and Dick decide to vandalize the property of the teacher who turned them. The boys were heard saying "had it coming," and deserved the actions based on what he had done to them. According to Techniques of Neutralization theory, which of the subcomponents of the theory best fits this example?
A. Denial of victim B. Denial of responsibility C. Denial of injury D. Appeal to higher loyalties
Crack cocaine is the result of a relatively safe chemical method due to treatment with ether.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)