In Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002), the Court held that a state capital sentencing procedure that permitted the sentencing judge to make the factual determination of the aggravating and mitigating circumstances present
a. violated the Sixth Amendment's right of trial by jury
b. violated the Sixth Amendment's right of trial by judge
c. violated the Sixth Amendment's right to a speedy trial
d. violated the Eight Amendment's right to freedom from cruel and unusual punishment
a
You might also like to view...
Victims of telemarketing fraud are most commonly:
a. middle-class. b. recently married. c. elderly. d. immigrants.
Which was not a destination of early United States immigrants in the early 1900s?
a. Ellis Island b. Angel Island c. San Diego d. Portland e. Both c and d
Excusable homicide is killing by mistake or in self-defense
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Which early colonial bail system enabled rich offenders to pay a fee and be released?
a. correctional system b. separate and silent system c. system of gaols d. fee system