TP sells franchises in the Old Fast Food chain. TP sells a franchise to Choi for $100,000 by cashier's check. Choi then hears that TP is going out of business and tries to stop payment on the check. TP has already transferred the money to a third party who meets the UCC's requirements for a holder in due course. The bank paid that third party. TP declares it is out of business. In a subsequent
lawsuit:
a. the court will find that the third party liable as surety
b. because of the fraud involved, the court will require the third party repay Choi
c. because the instrument involved was a cashier's check and not an ordinary check, the court will not require the third party to repay Choi
d. because the amount in controversy was more than $50,000, the courts will be empowered to view the fraud as a felony and will ignore the requirements of the UCC
e. none of the other choices
e
You might also like to view...
Which of the following statements is true?
A) An entry in a general ledger account can be traced to the trial balance by referring to the page listed in the posting reference column of that ledger account. B) The posting of an amount recorded in the general ledger can be verified by referring to the account number listed in the posting reference column on that line in the general journal. C) Business transactions are recorded first in the general ledger, then that information is transferred to the general journal. D) No explanation is needed for any entry in the general journal.
The advice "buy now and avoid future price increases" leads to a greater use of credit, but high rates of return on your investments may make that bad advice
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
E-mation entered into a contract with a consumer, Ezra, a recent immigrant to the United States, who spoke very little English, and had no formal education. The contract provided for Ezra to pay $2500 for a computer system. The system was worth $400 . If E-mation sued Ezra for enforcement the contract, what is the most likely result?
a. The contract is enforceable because of the Statute of Frauds. b. The contract is enforceable because of the parol evidence rule. c. The contract is enforceable because of the underlying reference rule. d. The contract is unenforceable because it is unconscionable.
Process capability analysis is a technique used to determine whether ______.
a. a process is able to meet a set of design specification limits b. a process falls within a set of control limits c. a process is compliant with government regulations d. a process is compliant with ISO requirements