Discuss the meta-analysis results for the effects of Conscientiousness on leader emergence and performance. How would you explain these results?
What will be an ideal response?
Conscientiousness helped people emerge as leaders, but it is interesting that it didn’t help leaders perform more effectively once Openness and Extraversion were taken into account. Perhaps this is because even ineffective leaders can be hard working, and what separates effective leaders most from ineffective ones is the quality of their decisions and their ability to work with others. Nonetheless, Conscientiousness still shows an important positive correlation with leadership emergence, so potential leaders need to work hard enough to get the promotion. The rest of the answer should be the student’s own thoughts about these results.
You might also like to view...
Andre, Beau, and Caroline share profits and losses of their partnership in a 3:3:7 ratio respectively. If the net income is $900,000, calculate Caroline's share of the profits. (Do not round any intermediate calculations.)
A) $207,692 B) $484,615 C) $161,538 D) $69,231
Generation X is the label often given to
A. those who survived the great depression. B. the "greatest generation" born between the baby boomer generation and their parents that were called Generation W, the World War II generation. C. persons 65 years old and older. D. those people who were born since the millennium. E. persons born between 1965 and 1976.
During economic downturns, the case for hiring workers from disadvantaged groups is ______.
a. not likely to be made b. much more difficult to make c. that this population would be more likely to accept lower wages therefore saving the company money d. that the lower skill set of this population is not needed during periods of economic downturn
All information systems include a computer
Indicate whether the statement is true or false