When initiating the process of mapping the arguments in a complex conversation between two individuals, which of the following questions is the best place to start?
(a) How many arguments does the first person make?
(b) What main conclusion is each person advocating?
(c) Does either person have anything worthwhile to add?
(d) How can the analyst briefly summarize each person's side of the debate?
(e) Do either of the individuals use counterarguments?
b
You might also like to view...
Statistics indicate that the faith consumers place in manufacturers is often misplaced
a. True b. False
Bentham recognized that ethics was not a science, and could never be one
indicate whethet this statement is true or false
Concerning the problem of faith and reason, Aquinas taught that
a. they are separate domains with no overlap. b. anything that can be known through reason can be known through faith. c. there are truths that can only be known through faith and some that can be known through either faith or reason. d. faith and reason are in conflict and one must follow one or the other, but not both.
If we take de Beauvoir's ethical observations seriously, it is obvious that it is always wrong to lie
Indicate whether the statement is true or false