The law of evidence is designed to:
A. ensure the accuracy of evidence presented at trial.
B. question the relevancy of evidence presented at trial.
C. protect the defendant in both civil and criminal trials.
D. ensure the timeliness of evidence presented at trial.
Answer: A
You might also like to view...
According to Lenore Walker’s cycle of violence, at which stage does the first episode of abuse typically occur?
a. the honeymoon stage b. the tension building stage c. the third stage d. the fourth stage
The use of combustible supplies and permitting of hazardous material and trash to collect shall ______________________________.
a) be minimized and avoided where possible b) be in accordance with the local fire code c) be in accordance with both the local fire and health code d) not be allowed.
What clause of the Fourteenth Amendment was the vehicle for incorporation of rights against the states?
a. Due process b. Equal protection c. Privileges and immunities d. Citizenship
Read the following facts regarding United States v. Sokolow (1989): Sokolow, appeared to be suspicious to police because while traveling under an alias from Honolulu, he paid $2,100 in $20 bills (taken from a larger sum of money) for a round-trip airline ticket to Miami. He spent a very short period of time in Miami. Sokolow was noticeably nervous and had checked no luggage. A warrantless airport investigation by Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agents revealed more than 1,000 grams of cocaine on the defendant. Based on the facts above, how did the U.S. Supreme Court rule?
A) The Court ruled that according to a "totality of the circumstances" criterion, in which the defendant's entire behavior is taken collectively to provide the basis for a legitimate stop, the evidence was admissible. B) Upon appeal, the Court ruled that no single activity was proof of illegal activity, and as such, the evidence was inadmissible. C) The court ruled that the stop was legal because the actions taken together created circumstances under which suspicion of illegal activity but that the search was illegal under the exclusionary rule. D) The court ruled that the stop and the search were illegal under the Fourth Amendment and as such, all evidence should have been excluded from trial.