In _____________, the court expanded the practitioner's duty to warn those in danger to include the circumstance in which a family member communicates to a mental health practitioner a belief that the client poses a risk of grave bodily injury to another person.
A. Tarasoff v. Board of Regents of the University of California
B. Jaffee v. Redmond
C. Ewing v. Goldstein
D. Petersen v. McDonald
Answer: C
You might also like to view...
Hich group of people were among the first to use a test for the selection of government employees?
a. The Chinese b. The French c. The English d. The German
What is the primary purpose of informed consent?
What will be an ideal response?
According to Seligman, the client's presenting concerns and underlying difficulties are the _______ when treatment planning:
a. point of origin b. destination c. roadblocks d. milestones
What was a major change between the third and fourth editions of the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, as it relates to validity?
a. The fourth edition included a tripartite view of validity b. The fourth edition included a unified view of validity c. The fourth edition emphasized scientific rigor when investigating validity d. The fourth edition eliminated discussion of validity