Even though Ms. Ross wasn’t charged with anything, do you think this case could serve as the basis for removing her from any paralegal organizations to which she might have belonged?
What will be an ideal response?
Since the court concluded that Ross had engaged in the unauthorized practice of law, and
since she behaved deceitfully on numerous occasions, to Smith, Reynolds, and the court
system itself, it’s safe to say that this case provides ample justification for a paralegal
organization removing her from its membership.ving her from its membership.
You might also like to view...
A publishing company that purchases a chain of bookstores to sell its books is an example of unrelated diversification.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
A company's history of exactly meeting analyst estimates is a factor which could lead auditors to assess inherent risk at a higher level
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
A nonprofit chief executive officer (CEO) is holding a meeting with volunteers to solicit their ideas for organizational improvement. The CEO is applying which type of capacity as described by Letts?
A. internal B. adaptive C. program D. expansion
Which of the following statements is true about the adage "When in Rome, do as the Romans do"?
A. It is derived from the idea that a virtuous individual derives utmost satisfaction from his or her good actions. B. Its logic is similar to an economic calculation of utility or cost-benefit. C. The adage assumes that an individual is distinct from the entire universe. D. The adage is derived from the idea of cultural relativism.