Is there a “CSI effect” in criminal investigation? Provide reasons in support of, and opposition to this question
What will be an ideal response?
The “CSI effect” refers to the possibility that TV programs focusing on criminal investigations and forensic techniques may be creating unrealistic courtroom expectations among jurors that cannot be achieved in real life. Some court officers, including some prosecutors and defense attorneys, believe this effect is truly present.
A survey of judges in Kentucky found the impact has been strong but not in expected areas. Most said that jurors have come to expect more forensic evidence and believed that shows like CSI have distorted the public’s perception of the time required to obtain forensic results. A slight majority believed the popularity of these shows has made it harder to convict defendants, and many also said they believed these programs create unrealistic representations about the state of the forensic art in their jurisdiction, as well as the speed of forensic testing.
However, it may be that the CSI effect is more of a nuisance rather than a substantial factor in criminal justice processing, or it may be substantial only in certain types of cases involving certain issues.
You might also like to view...
Tittle’s control balance theory states that deviance results when people are very _____ or very controlled
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
Explain the overview of the broken windows model in terms of a ?domino effect.?
What will be an ideal response?
There are three critical, interrelated issues in the lives of women offenders. Which is not one of these issues?
a. Substance abuse b. Trauma c. Mental health d. Pregnancy
The Judiciary Act of 1891, also known as the Evans Act, has the distinction of creating the:
a. Practice of circuit riding b. Federal Appellate Court c. Judicial branch of government d. 13 United States Circuit Court of Appeals