Is an impasse in bargaining in a multiemployer unit an unusual circumstance justifying unilateral withdrawal?
An impasse in bargaining in a multiemployer unit is not an unusual circumstance justifying unilateral withdrawal. It is a recurring feature in the bargaining process, which in almost all cases is eventually broken. Parties at impasse commonly recognize that sooner or later they will agree on the terms for a new collective bargaining agreement.
You might also like to view...
All stakeholders need to agree upon the requirements before the start of the project
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
The Lanham Act: I. Focuses on trademark registration and protection. II. Was passed in reaction to the Great Depression. III. Gives competitors the right to sue for false claims a rival company makes about the competitor's product. IV. Does not allow a company to sue for false claims a rival company makes about their own products
a. I & II only b. II & III only c. I, I and III only d. I, II III, and IV
Founders' shares, a type of classified stock owned by the firm's founders, generally have more votes per share than the other classes of common stock.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
A(n) ________ creates, organizes, tracks, and destroys other objects, often instances of an entity class
A) interface object B) lifecycle object C) utility object D) flow object