Explain audience fragmentation. Is it a good thing or not? What are some positive and negative consequences of it?
Answer:
An ideal response will:
1. Define audience fragmentation as the scattering of audiences across multiple press outlets due to the growth of cable television and the Internet and the subsequent specialization of the media content for those venues.
2. Make a clear argument for why fragmentation is or is not beneficial by illustrating the benefits of fragmentation (diffuses the influence of the media, works against the effects of conglomeration) versus the costs (fragmentation and separation of audiences who cannot understand the issues of others).
You might also like to view...
Health care, education, housing, transit, job training, and urban renewal were all targets of President Johnson’s ______ programs.
a. Great Society b. Great Depression c. Square Deal d. New Deal
Although it is not specified in the Constitution, one of the primary functions of Congress is the supervision and evaluation of the administration and execution of laws and policies, which is commonly referred to as congressional oversight
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Under many circumstances, increased media attention can favor an incumbent president; however, it can easily damage a campaign when __________
A) the president fails to fix a problem and the media implies he is making it worse B) another news story focuses attention elsewhere C) a challenging candidate makes a political "gaff," attracting media attention to himself D) the president fixes a problem to the dissatisfaction of the opposing party
After college, one way to remain current in the field of psychology is to read published research findings
Indicate whether the statement is true or false