Why is it important to identify any significantly ambiguous words when reading a legal case?
What will be an ideal response?
When a court relies on a significantly ambiguous word or phrase, it is relying on a term that is capable of having more than one meaning in the context of the facts. Depending on the various meanings the court adopts, the conclusion that a particular judge reaches may seem either consistent or inconsistent with that term (which is often tied to a reason in support of the proffered conclusion). Moreover, ambiguous words used as part of a legal rule can have a substantial impact on the conclusion that naturally flows from a particular set of facts.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is an example of an open-source desktop operating system?
A. Microsoft Windows B. IIS C. Apache D. MySQL E. Ubuntu
Cost advantages that are gained from economies of scale in production may later be lost to inventory carrying costs.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
When a categorical variable has 5 levels, ________ dummy variables need to be added to the model
A) 5 B) 0 C) 4 D) 2
The "Cycle of Mediocrity" is most often found in large, bureaucratic organizations like regulated oligopolies.
a. true b. false