Did the OFCCP violate the plaintiff-government-contractor's Fourth Amendment rights against an unreasonable administrative search by the federal government?
Selection of the government contractor for an administrative search by the OFCCP to ensure that it maintained an affirmative action program mandated by Executive Order 11246 was made pursuant to a neutral administrative plan, and thus did not violate the Fourth Amendment. The administrative plan had clear criteria for ultimate selection for actual review by the OFCCP.
You might also like to view...
A study conducted in two prisons showed that the more contact white inmates experienced with African American inmates, the more positive their attitudes toward the African American inmates became. This is an example of the ________ hypothesis.
A. coalition B. contact C. conflict reduction D. climate E. groupthink
________ refer to two or more outlets that are commonly owned and controlled
A) Corporate chains B) Factory stores C) Specialty stores D) Designer shops E) Warehouse clubs
To Do lists should not be prioritized
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Two years ago, Tom contributed investment land with a basis of $50,000 and an FMV of $62,000 to the RST Partnership. This year, Tom has a basis in his partnership interest of $53,000 when he receives a current distribution of $14,000 cash and inventory with a basis of $35,000 and an FMV of $52,000. (There is no Sec. 751 exchange in connection with the inventory distribution.) The partnership
continues to hold the land Tom contributed. How much gain (if any) must Tom recognize as a result of this distribution? What will be an ideal response?