What are the major Court holdings regarding racial profiling and equal protection cited in the textbook? Which holdings do you agree with, and which do you disagree with? Explain your position
What will be an ideal response?
The major Court holdings regarding racial profiling and equal protection are United
States v. Sokolow, Whren v. United States, Brown v. Oneonta, and United States
v. Travis. I agree with all of them, because they are efforts at determining the
primary motivation of the officer. Is the officer making the stop primarily due to the
race of the person, or is it primarily due to another reason, and race happens to be
involved?
You might also like to view...
Research finds that females engage in promiscuous sex more than males
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Geographic profiling is a useful investigative tool in any case in which an individual offender has committed criminal activity across a series of locations
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
An officer’s sworn statement, submitted to apply for a warrant, is known as a/an _____.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
So long as "reasonable precautions" are taken, no crime occurs if a property owner uses fire or explosives to destroy any building on his own land
Indicate whether the statement is true or false