Otherwise trustworthy statements taken during an investigation in violation of Miranda may still be used:
a. in habeas corpus proceedings
b. to prove guilt during the prosecution’s initial presentation of evidence
c. in post-conviction relief proceedings
d. to impeach (attack) the credibility of a defendant who testifies differently from the statements made during the investigation
Answer: d. to impeach (attack) the credibility of a defendant who testifies differently from the statements made during the investigation
You might also like to view...
Which of the following cases supports the view that serious scholars can't be required to turn over their field notes in a grand jury investigation?
a. Ofshe b. Hutchinson c. Scarce d. Brajuha
The __________ Act was designed to fight terrorism but has provisions that apply to other forms of criminal activity as well
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
Identify and briefly describe the single most important U.S. Supreme Court case with respect to juvenile justice
What will be an ideal response?
In which of the following situations would the prosecution be allowed to introduce evidence about the defendant's motive?
a. any case that goes to trial without a jury b. for felonies but not misdemeanors c. in specific intent crimes d. evidence of motive is admissible in all of these situations