The systematic exclusion of certain peoples has a history of varied practices and implementations. What is the primary difference between the implementation of numerical quotas and the use of literacy tests in terms of their fundamental designs?
A. Numerical quotas are simpler to systematically implement, while literacy tests require an unrealistic amount of examination and determination.
B. Numerical quotas suggest the absolute limits of the United States’ capacity, while literacy tests suggest the openness of borders to capable peoples.
C. Numerical quotas are quantifiable limitations on certain peoples, while literacy tests are externally neutral with racist intentions.
D. Numerical quotas offer immigrants transparency in terms of immigration limits, while literacy tests generate unfair expectations of openness.
C. Numerical quotas are quantifiable limitations on certain peoples, while literacy tests are externally neutral with racist intentions.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following accurately describes direct lobbying?
A. It is rarely used by interest groups. B. It includes efforts to sway public opinion on a policy issue. C. It was made illegal in Texas with the passage of the Controlling Special Interests Act of 2002. D. It includes communicating information to policymakers and testifying for legislation at hearings.
A(n) ______ is a form of government in which a small exclusive class holds supreme power
A) republic B) monarchy C) oligarchy D) theocracy E) civic union
Council members cite ________ as the most influential group or organization that is active before the council
A. civic associations
B. taxpayer groups
C. growth-management groups
D. business interests
In which event was there congressional oversight?
a. the approval of President Obama's 2008 budget b. the Line Item Veto Act of 1996 c. the Supreme Court nomination of Clarence Thomas d. investigation into cyber threats to the US election system