John, realizing that he is slowly dying of a painful cancer, asks Carl to kill him. Carl is hesitant, but John executes a document that states in one part, “I hereby consent to the ending of my life by Carl who is acting under my express desires. I hereby direct that Carl should suffer no legal detriment by his actions.” When John’s body is discovered, Carl is charged with murder. Carl produces the document. What will result?

a. The case against Carl should be dismissed because John consented to Carl’s mercy killing.
b. The case against Carl is legally sufficient because John could not consent to his own murder.
c. The case against Carl should be dismissed because it lacks the required element of malice.
d. The case against Carl is legally sufficient because John was obviously legally
incompetent.


b. The case against Carl is legally sufficient because John could not consent to his own murder.

Legal Studies & Paralegal

You might also like to view...

An intent-to-use applicant must file a specimen when the Statement of Use is filed.

Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)

Legal Studies & Paralegal

Joint tenancy property is called a ________________ asset because the property automatically passes to the survivor(s) as a matter of law.

Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).

Legal Studies & Paralegal

Use short sentences to emphasize favorable information.

Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)

Legal Studies & Paralegal

The compilation of chemicals maintained by the EPA under TSCA is known as:

a. The TSCA List b. The Chemical Survey c. The TSCA Inventory d. The Toxicity Index

Legal Studies & Paralegal