What is the danger in confusing "average" with "normal" in sex research?
What will be an ideal response?
In sex research, there is a tendency among people to confuse "average" with "normal." For example, upon reading a statistic which states that the average person has intercourse twice a week, a person may compare the frequency of their own sexual activity with the statistic and arrive at the conclusion that he or she is either undersexed or oversexed. Such conclusions are a mistake because there is a great deal of variability in sexual behavior and any behavior within a wide range is perfectly normal.
You might also like to view...
What is the most typical reason a wife murders her husband?
a. revenge c. frustration b. jealousy d. self-defense
Which of the following types of data removes all possibilities of identifying individual respondents?
A. confidential B. aggregate C. quantitative D. anonymous
________ refers to a small break in the anal tissue that may result from anal intercourse without proper lubrication.
A. Anilingus B. Cunnilingus C. Laceration D. Fissure E. Coitus
Which of the following is most likely considered to be a potentially harmful method of obtaining information on the sexual behavior of children?
A. observing the sexual behavior of children directly B. documenting the childhood experiences of convicted sex offenders C. asking adults to recount sexual experiences from their childhood D. documenting the childhood experiences of commercial sex workers