The norms of noninterference in the internal affairs of states are stronger than the norms against genocide. Do you agree or disagree? Why? Provide examples to support your answer
What will be an ideal response?
Ideal Answer: The ideal answer should include:
1. Define noninterference and genocide.
2. Recall the implications of self-determination, sovereignty, intervention, social norms, dehumanization, and other key concepts around the two issues.
3. Explain why you agree or disagree with the notion that norms of noninterference in internal affairs of states are stronger than the norms against genocide.
4. Discuss how relevant examples, such as Rwanda, demonstrate the prescience of your answer.
5. Offer a compelling summary and conclusion.
You might also like to view...
Globalization refers to the constant increase in the temperature of the polar ice pack
Indicate whether this statement is true or false.
A belief that political participation can have some effect is referred to as a sense of:
A. civic duty. B. political efficacy. C. political intensity. D. party identification.
As described by Hartzell and Hoddie, in a military victory that ends a civil conflict, what is the most likely outcome for the losing side?
a. The grievances of the losing side will continue to exist. b. The losing side will leave the state where the conflict occurred. c. The losing side will rebel in the near future and reignite the conflict. d. The losing side will suffer no consequences in the aftermath of the conflict.
Discuss the power to persuade, going public, presidential character, and presidential style. Why are these personal features so important to presidential success? How do they help us to understand the presidency in ways that just studying the constitutional powers of the presidency does not?
What will be an ideal response?