In the Holcomb v. Iona College case referenced in the text, a white assistant coach of a college basketball team alleged he was fired because he was married to an African American woman, and sued the college for violation of Title VII. How did the court rule?
a. The court ruled that Title VII was inapplicable to such claims.
b. The court ruled that Title VII was inapplicable because a private college, as opposed to a public college, was involved.
c. The court ruled that Title VII protects the parties involved in a racially mixed marriage, but that in other situations, such as dating relationships, Title VII would not apply.
d. The court ruled that Title VII protects employees from discrimination based on their association with a person of a different race.
d
You might also like to view...
When a union would negotiate substandard wages or working conditions, or ignore employer contract violations, while still collecting union dues, it was called a ________ contract.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
Which of the following is not an item added back to income in the operations section of the statement of cash flows when using the indirect presentation?
a. Depreciation b. Amortization of goodwill c. Increase in deferred income taxes d. Amortization of bond premium e. Amortization of patents
A rational and systematic allocation base for service department costs should reflect the cost accountant's consideration of all of the following except
a. the ability of revenue-producing departments to bear the allocated costs. b. the benefits received by the revenue-producing department from the service department. c. a causal relationship between factors in the revenue-producing department and costs incurred in the service department. d. all of the above are considerations.
A mark distinctive enough to clearly identify the origin of the goods or services can be protected under:
a. the Federal Copyright Act. b. the Lanham Act. c. the Berne Convention. d. compulsory licenses.