Explain the difference between mala in se and mala prohibita crimes.
What will be an ideal response?
Mala in se crimes, or crimes that are inherently harmful because they generate strong emotional
responses in all victims of them. A core of acts that are universally condemned and criminalized.
Examples include murder, rape, assault, and theft. Acts not considered mala in se may or may not be
criminalized in a particular place at a particular time according to the social attitudes surrounding those
acts at the time. These are referred to as mala prohibita crimes.
You might also like to view...
What distinguished early professionals from others was that
A. they were royalty B. they could read and write C. they were noble born D. they could vote
What is chronological concurrence?
What will be an ideal response?
Which Supreme Court case ended the moratorium on the death penalty?
a. Furman v. Georgia (1972) b. Coker v. Georgia (1977) c. Powell v. Alabama (1932) d. Gregg v. Georgia (1976)
Law is a rule of conduct or procedure established by custom, agreement, or authority.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)