Which of the following is a valid categorical syllogism?
A. "No animals are plants. John is a mammal. Therefore, John is not a plant."
B. "Some animals are mammals. John is a mammal. Therefore, John is an animal."
C. "Some animals are mammals. John is an animal. Therefore, John is a mammal."
D. "No animals are plants. John is an animal. Therefore, John is not a plant."
Answer: D
You might also like to view...
Write a dialogue in which two characters discuss their competing images of the meaning of life. One of the characters can represent your preferences, and the other can represent a viewpoint on meaning that you do not prefer. Your dialogue should bring out and explain each image in some detail; it should discuss the relative strengths and weaknesses of each. Finally, it should provide a reasoned
argument or explanation why, given their strengths and weaknesses, the images are compelling to the characters. Be creative in writing your dialogue, and have fun, but stay focused on the issues. You might also stage this dialogue as an oral presentation in front of your class, or make a video of it. What will be an ideal response?
Roche can defend its use of harvested organs solely on the basis of ethical relativism
a. True b. False
In order to satisfy the R condition, one must just show that the premises are negatively or positively relevant to each other
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Philosophical questions can be answered in the same way as mathematical questions
Indicate whether this statement is true or false.