In CASE 6.1 Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (2010) before the U.S. Supreme Court, the plaintiffs brought various constitutional challenges involving the appointment and standards for removal of members of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. How did the Court rule and why?
a. That limitations on the removal of Board members contravened the Constitution's separation of powers and that the unconstitutional provisions were not severable from the remainder of the statute.
b. That limitations on the removal of Board members contravened the Constitution's separation of powers but that the unconstitutional provisions were severable from the remainder of the statute.
c. That limitations on the removal of Board members were constitutional.
d. That limitations on the removal of Board members were constitutional only so long as the executive branch failed to challenge the restrictions placed on the president.
b
You might also like to view...
_____ are the functions that a system is expected to fulfill and the features through which it will perform its tasks.
A. IT visions B. Systems designs C. IT tactics D. System requirements
Which of the following ratios represents dividends per common share in relation to market price per common share?
a. Dividend payout b. Dividend yield c. Price/earnings d. Book value per share e. Percentage of earnings retained
When considering an ethical issue, which of the following does the Josephson Institute suggest be considered as part of the CHARACTER COUNTS! curriculum?
A. take into account the interest of key stakeholders B. put core ethical values above financial values C. First consider personal financial interests. D. If you must violate a core principal, try to keep others from knowing.
A series of equivalent cash flows is called the accumulation factor.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)