Describe the general functional perspective on poverty and inequality. Then discuss three potential functions poverty can serve for a society. Finally, what is one important criticism of the functional perspective on poverty?

Question

What will be an ideal response?

Answer 1

Functionalists argue some level of social inequality is inevitable and functional. Some positions in a society are more specialized and valuable. Only a few have the talent for more important positions. Learning those skills requires sacrifices, so people must receive more resources and rewards to compensate.
Different positions in the social hierarchy have different levels of prestige and esteem.
Functions of poverty may include:
get "dirty work" done cheaply;
encourage the purchase of lower quality products; and
give higher status to others (someone must be at the bottom).
One potential criticism of this perspective is that poverty can be dysfunctional if it is economically or morally costly. Other answers may vary.