What has toxic tort litigation done for forensic science?
What will be an ideal response?
While many automatically think of the criminal courts when forensic science is mentioned, it has been the civil court that has driven the increase of scientific testimony into the courtroom. These are the so-called toxic torts and product liability cases. These cases are common because a significant amount of money, in the form of damages can be involved. In some instances this has led to the appearance of the courtroom being more a battle of expert witnesses rather than a search for the truth.
You might also like to view...
Discuss how lying is related to Kant’s argument regarding conflicting duties.
What will be an ideal response?
The biggest difference between first- and second-degree murder is which of the following?
a. First-degree murder requires malice. b. Second-degree murder does not require malice. c. First-degree murder requires premeditation and deliberation. d. Second-degree murder requires premeditation and deliberation.
A partisan election of judges differs greatly from other types of elections for public office
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Explain the significance of Gregg v. Georgia (1976) as it relates to discretion by the jury.
What will be an ideal response?