Summarize factors that led to the ultimate demise of the LTTE
What will be an ideal response?
• In December 2001, the LTTE agreed to a ceasefire with the government of Sri
Lanka. Although the Tigers still threatened violence, their resources may have been
depleting.
• The Council on Foreign Relations (Zissis, 2006) believes that the international
community's efforts to thwart terrorism after September 11 were responsible
for this situation.
• Arms shipments were virtually eliminated, and expatriate Tamil
communities in Australia, Canada, and the United States were forbidden to gather
and ship resources to Sri Lanka.
• Draining economic resources accomplished what Sri Lankan security forces could not do. The Tamil Tigers lost their striking power.
• Facing a weakened LTTE, Sri Lankan security forces developed a new strategy
for a final offensive. They created "no-fire zones" and moved into Tamil areas. People
in the area could stay and fight; stay and hope that they would not be killed or injured;
flee, risking injury or death; or move into the no-fire zone.
• Police and military forces established order in the no-fire zones, interrogating and arresting suspects at will.
• The strategy worked. Every person who remained in the area was considered to
be an enemy, and the army unleashed a conventional offensive.
• The LTTE had remained the aggressor through most of the campaign, and it had forced security forces onto the defensive.
• The role was now reversed, and the Tamil Tigers fought on the military's terms. Unable to use guerrilla or terrorist tactics, the Tamil Tigers fought a defensive battle against conventional assaults.
• With limited communications and no ability to resupply or use the airport, the LTTE lost ground in every encounter. Many of the commanders began blowing themselves up rather than surrender. Pirapaharan died in this manner. Fighting ended in May, with the remaining Tamil Tigers surrendering (Chamberlain and Tran, 2009).
You might also like to view...
In the proving of entrapment, evidence of criminal history is more important to the objective test than to the subjective test.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
The more detail the interviewee provides, the more likely it is they are telling the truth is called?
a. Descriptions of interactions b. Contextual embedding c. Unexpected complications d. Quantity of detail
Which theorist is associated with the looking-glass self?
A. George Herbert Mead B. Albert J. Reiss C. Ian Nye D. Charles H. Cooley
The crime of ______________ consists of holding or confining someone against his or her will without legal justification
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word.