Which of the following statements is true of the fault rule when an engagement is broken?
A) If the person who accepted the engagement ring breaks off the engagement, the ring will be owned by the person who marries first.
B) If the person who accepted the engagement ring breaks off the engagement, he or she can retain the engagement ring.
C) If the person who gave the engagement ring breaks off the engagement, the other side can rightfully keep the engagement ring.
D) If the person who gave the engagement ring breaks off the engagement, the ring is sold at an auction and the proceeds are shared between both parties.
C
You might also like to view...
Which is typically true of the purpose men have for communicating with others?
a. to empathize b. to build the relationship c. to solve problems d. to spend time together
The _______ entails all aspects of a customer firm's encounter with a supplier firm. Ideally, the TCE should be a positive, seamless, and memorable interaction that matches the customer firm's purchasing requirements and preferences
a. total customer experience (TCE) b. business channel management c. fulfillment management d. value-added management
All bailments have to be by agreement between the bailor and bailee
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
According to the text, is an employer negligent for failing to protect an employee from being attacked by a dog, whether or not the dog is known to have abnormally dangerous propensities? (See the Labaj v. VanHouston case.)
a. An employer has no duties in regard to an animal on the premises because of the rule that animals cannot be absolutely controlled under any circumstances. b. An employer can be held strictly liable for failing to protect an employee from getting attached by a dog, even if the dog is not known to possess abnormally dangerous propensities. c. An employer cannot be negligent for failing to protect an employee from getting attached by a dog unless the dog is not known to possess abnormally dangerous propensities. d. An employer can be negligent for failing to protect an employee from getting attached by a dog, even if the dog is not known to possess abnormally dangerous propensities.