Briefly describe the Analysis-of-Variance approach to content validity evidence.
What will be an ideal response?
This method builds on the methods proposed by Anderson and Gerbing (1991) and Schriesheim et al. (1993) and asks panel members to rate each item according to the extent to which it is consistent with a construct definition provided (i.e., from 1 “not at all” to 5 “completely”) (Hinkin & Tracey, 1999). A between-subjects design is implemented in which each group of raters is given all items but only one construct definition (although the items provided represent several constructs). The results are analyzed using principal component analysis (as in the Schriesheim et al., 1993, method). Then an ANOVA is used to assess each item’s content validity by comparing the item’s mean rating on one construct to the item’s ratings on the other constructs. A sample size of about 50 panel members seems adequate for this type of analysis.
You might also like to view...
What are the characteristics of an effective separation agreement?
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
Avoid including personal data such as ____ in your résumé.?
A. ?marital status B. ?employment history C. ?education D. ?professional affiliations
What would be primary authority as to what is the definition of a holographic will?
A) A statute B) A law dictionary C) A law review D) An encyclopedia on point
A(n) ________ claim is a debt that takes precedence over others because it is within the public interest to do so, or the money is owed to the government
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word