Why do environmentalists such as Paul Ehrlich view unchecked population growth as a problem?
What will be an ideal response?
Environmentalists recognize that much of Earth's natural capital cannot be effectively replaced. Land area is one of these. We cannot expand Earth, increasing its surface area to accommodate an unlimited population. Overpopulation also leads to degradation of natural systems and loss of biodiversity. We cannot always devise a prosthesis for lost ecosystem services and cannot replicate the exact function of missing species in ecosystems. Lost species may perform vital ecosystem services, such as pollination, and also have educational, aesthetic, or medicinal value that is irreplaceable.
While Ehrlich's predictions of the 1960s have not fully materialized in the 2000s, the fact remains that many ecosystem services are in a state of decline, and despite the view of some Cornucopian economists that we can safely ignore his warnings, the pressure of a growing population on essential resources and biodiversity remains unmistakable.
You might also like to view...
Refuse-derived fuel differs from normal garbage in that it
A. Is sorted B. Has agricultural wastes C. Is selectively collected D. Has coal added E. Is unsorted
Among developing regions, the literacy rate exceeds 90 percent in East Asia and Latin America, but is less than 70 percent in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
Urbanization can alter the amount and timing of runoff and cause flood events to become more
common. Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
National pride, scientific curiosity, and various advancements in shipbuilding fueled the golden age of polar exploration much like the spread of commerce fueled the original golden age of exploration
Indicate whether the statement is true or false