In Orkal Industries v. Array Connector, where Orkal bought parts from Array by sending an order form, but Array confirmed with its own form that contained different terms. Orkal did not object to the different terms until litigation arose later at which point the added terms mattered. The courts held that under the UCC:
a. the buyer, Orkal, controlled the terms, so the original order form controls the contract
b. the buyer, Orkal, would have to provide new consideration for any change in the terms of the original contract
c. the seller, Array, controlled because Orkal's form contained major defects that made it fail as sufficient to create a contact
d. the seller, Array, controlled because under UCC 2-207, a sellers terms always control e. none of the other choices are correct
e
You might also like to view...
Information created by others, often published in print or on the Web is known as ________
A) secondary data B) structured content C) microcontent D) metadata
Recovery in a product liability case may be limited when it can be shown that the plaintiff misused the product
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
The purpose of financial statement analysis for internal users is to provide information to improve efficiency and effectiveness.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
To be a close corporation, the business must be small, with no more than 20 owners and no more than $500,000 in gross annual income.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)