Why would the flu not be a good malady for studying in a N of 1 Randomized Clinical Trial methodology? Why would a group design be better?
What will be an ideal response?
The flu doesn't meet an important criterion associated with successful use of the N of 1 RCT. The flue is neither stable nor chronic; it can't be evaluated over time because it doesn't last long enough. A group design would be better because a researcher can evaluate different treatments over the relatively short course of the flu, without worrying that the symptoms would disappear before different treatments could be evaluated.
You might also like to view...
Federalists called for ______.
a. supporting the new Constitution and a strong national government b. including a Bill of Rights and a strong state government c. strong restrictions on branches of government d. controls against the tyranny of the minority
Which of the following is the primary determinant of the wage gap in the United States?
A. the educational qualifications of a woman employee B. the political orientation of a woman employee being liberal or conservative C. the socio-economic status of a woman employee D. the parental status of a woman employee E. the degree of religiosity among women employees
Empowering police forces and other government officials to check U.S. citizenship credentials is an example of
a. delegated powers. b. enumerated powers. c. police powers. d. reserved powers. e. legislative powers.
What major 2008 event sparked debate concerning the government's size and role?
A) Financial Crisis B) Hurricane Katrina C) War in Libya D) Arab Spring