What is the key difference between police patrol and fire alarm approaches to oversight? From your perspective, is any one more effective than the other for achieving an understanding about program effectiveness?
What will be an ideal response?
Police patrol oversight describes the effort to routinize oversight of agencies in the effort of identifying problems with implementation (e.g., review of impact of social program). Fire alarm oversight describes how legislators respond to executive branch problems as they arise (e.g., emerging scandal). An appropriate response to the subjective response may comment that the police patrol strategy is more aligned with continuous improvement of the program (therefore being the more effective strategy).
You might also like to view...
Discuss the contradictory views of Americans who praise their representatives but have disdain for Congress in general.
What will be an ideal response?
Concerning the resolution of collective action problems, which of the following is true
a. The more actors are part of a given collective action problem, the harder it is to solve. b. Only if significant value is placed on current costs and benefits is cooperation today rational. c. One way to resolve free rider issues is to deny selective benefits to those who participate in their resolution. d. Realism is optimistic about the prospects for cooperation in environmental collective action problems.
The president's real ability to persuade Congress often rests on which of the following?
A) personal popularity of the president B) the president's formal powers C) the president's informal powers D) the president's veto powers E) his wife's appeal
Which of the following Texas economic regions is considered to be the financial center of the state?
What will be an ideal response?