Collectively, the U.S. Supreme Court cases Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger suggest that affirmation action
a. is likely permissible if it is narrowly tailored to fulfill a compelling state interest and does not rely on quotas.
b. is likely permissible as long as it is a points-based system and is otherwise colorblind.
c. is likely permissible as long as it reduces racial inequality and promotes cultural awareness or understanding.
d. may be unconstitutional if the goal is to promote diversity.
e. is typically unconstitutional.
A
You might also like to view...
Because Puerto Ricans who reside on the island are not United States citizens, they are not eligible for welfare benefits and food stamps
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
What is the third largest political party in the United States?
a. Reform Party b. Green Party c. Constitutional Party d. Libertarian Party e. Socialist Party
What explains the decision to eventually eliminate anti-slavery language in the new constitution?
a. anti-slavery sentiment b. Connecticut Compromise c. fear of splintering the convention d. slave states had more votes
NGOs such as Human Rights Watch often havean advantage over national governments in dealing with human right abuses. This happens because NGOs have ______ than governments.
a. more financial backing b. more college-educated employees c. more power d. a more single-minded purpose