What would be the most likely consequence if courts did not have the power of judicial review?
What will be an ideal response?
An ideal response will:
1, Discuss the role of judicial review in ensuring that the actions of the other branches comply with the Constitution.
2, Explain that the legislative branch would likely pass unconstitutional laws if the courts had no power to invalidate such legislation.
3, Draw a direct connection between judicial review and the preservation of individual liberty.
4, Explain that judicial review empowers the judicial branch to operate as an effective "check" on the other branches of government.
You might also like to view...
If a state can use force against its citizens, and can use this coercive ability to demand that its citizens provide it with as much revenue (wealth, taxes, and so on) as it chooses, why wouldn’t a state act in a predatory manner?
A. They do—we should expect all states to be predatory in an unlimited fashion. B. If a state expects to be able extract more resources over time by committing to limit its predation, then it should do so.
What is the goal of land-grant colleges?
What will be an ideal response?
The national party convention has developed into a contentious meeting that selects candidates for congressional, state, and local offices
Indicate whether this statement is true or false.
Analyze how the news media have evolved and adapted to new technologies.
What will be an ideal response?