In Fine v. Delalande, the federal court remanded the case to state court because?
A. ?the court had no subject matter jurisdiction.
B. ?the case contained no federal case or controversy.
C. ?Delalande, Inc., had its principal place of business in the same state in which eleven of the plaintiffs lived.
D. ?of lack of standing.
Answer: C
You might also like to view...
What is the difference between work- and worker-oriented job analysis approaches?
What will be an ideal response?
?Allison wants to set up a sole proprietorship. She doesnotneed to
A. ?make a partnership agreement. B. ?file appropriate papers with the state. C. ?file appropriate papers with the federal government. D. ?All of these choices are correct.
Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA) allows a divorced, separated spouse, or surviving spouse to continued employer-provided health insurance for up to 36 months
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
To win a lawsuit, the plaintiff must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that defendant is liable
Indicate whether the statement is true or false