Redman and Merz (2008) reviewed the public records for outcomes and consequences for investigators that were found to have engaged in scientific misconduct. Discuss what they found during their review.
What will be an ideal response?
They identified 106 individuals over an eight year period, 1994 to 2001, that were reported publicly by the Office of Research Integrity. These individuals include those with a Ph.D and/or a M.D. The scientific misconduct was identified as: data falsification or plagiarism. Consequences for those engaging in scientific misconduct were found to be removal from grant funding opportunities and institutional oversight. Finally some were required to correct scientific papers that included the falsified or plagiarized information.
You might also like to view...
Analogue methodology lacks precision—not only in terms of the variables under examination, but also in terms of experimental procedures
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Explain the concept of heteronormativity.
What will be an ideal response?
Maintaining a pathological state of equilibrium within the family system is called:
a. homeostasis b. boundaries c. triads d. subsytems
Counselors should foster the client's entry into treatment by stressing the importance of
a. ending all relationships that cause emotional distress b. avoiding any and all substances c. complying with treatment recommendation to ensure positive outcomes d. attending self-help meetings