How has technology affected the practice of criminal justice in America during the past century? How has it affected the criminal law?
What will be an ideal response?
One hundred years ago, American police officers walked beats or rode horses and communicated by whistles and shouts. Criminal investigation was less scientific than intuitive, court cases were often resolved more on the popularity of the defendant than on the weight of the evidence, and American prisons were bleak edifices immersed in the industrial prison era. Today, American police officers walk beats or ride horses—or automobiles, motorcycles, bicycles, boats, or aircraft. They have instant communication with other patrol members, their leaders at the precinct or departmental headquarters, the mayor, the governor, the Pentagon, or the president, if necessary, via an incredible communications network using satellite or computer communications. All manner of forensic and scientific resources remove guesswork from criminal investigations. Court cases are far more informed by precedent and constitutional considerations than ever before, but they are also often strongly influenced by the economic status of the accused.
You might also like to view...
A street name for heroin is:
a. Smack b. Dank c. Dots d. G
A community __________ board is designed to facilitate the involvement of community members in an offender's reentry to society
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Federalism is a matter of concern in constitutional law because of the structure of American government
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Identify the sanctions included in the continuum or ladder of intermediate sanctions
What will be an ideal response?