Discuss, using specific examples, ways in which technology has changed law enforcement
What will be an ideal response?
There are many examples of how technology has changed law enforcement. Perhaps one of the biggest impacts has been through DNA testing. DNA fingerprinting is now used as evidence in majority of states and allows the suspect to be identified on the basis of the genetic material found in hair, blood, and other bodily tissues and fluids. Despite some ethical and practical questions concerning its use, it has helped solve multiple crimes and exonerate many innocent individuals. New investigations are constantly being developed, such as genetic algorithms, policing without discretion, AR technology, and ABIS.
You might also like to view...
Police chiefs who were promoted from within versus those hired from outside their departments have been found in studies to differ in their:
A) educational attainment B) racial characteristics C) attitude D) salary levels
Which of the following statements is most accurate regarding crimes and offenses of strict liability?
a. The accused must be aware that he or she was speeding when clocked by radar. b. The accused was aware that he or she was speeding when clocked by radar but didn't mean to do it. c. The accused was aware that he or she was speeding when clocked by radar, but had a good excuse for doing it. d. The accused was clocked on radar exceeding the speed limit.
Which of the following is true of corporate criminal liability?
a. It preceded the assignment of corporate civil liability b. It is based on the proposition that corporations are natural persons, not juristic persons c. It is largely a 20th-century phenomenon d. It was a fully formed doctrine in Europe by the 15th century
The general rule is that the consent of the victim is _________ a defense to criminal prosecution
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word