Is there such a thing as "good taste"? Plato and Aristotle would have answered "Yes," in light of their shared belief that beauty (or, more generally, aesthetic value) is objective. Many people today, however, reject their objectivism, claiming instead that "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder." This means that the reality of beauty is subjective, depending on the responses and tastes of people
to artwork. This is a much more democratic viewpoint insofar as it seems to imply the equality of all tastes. However, some philosophers, in particular Hume and Kant, developed a middle ground between Plato and Aristotle's strong objectivism and democratic subjectivism. They try to defend good taste and some version of subjectivism. Write an essay on this disagreement. Start by laying out Plato and Aristotle's viewpoint and its implications for aesthetic taste. Then describe the democratic, subjectivist response. Follow this with an overview of Hume and Kant's viewpoints on taste. Do you believe that either Hume or Kant succeeded in carving out a workable compromise?
What will be an ideal response?
This essay requires students to capture some of the dialectic of objectivism and subjectivism featured in the chapter, while explaining the middle-ground modernist viewpoint of Hume and Kant.
You might also like to view...
The Golden Temple of Amritsar is in
a. India c. Iraq b. Pakistan d. Germany
Paul Ramsey believes that it may be morally legitimate to use captive populations of children in research studies
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Describe why ethics must not be religious in character when one compares moral ideals in Western and non-Western cultures. A. Ethics must be secular, not religious, because secular reasons are subject tointerpretation by one's own self-interests while religious reasons re notsubject to interpretation
B. Ethics must be secular, not religious, because secular reasons are accessibleto those seeking to live a moral lifestyle, while religious reasons are onlyaccessible to those in a particular religion. C. Ethics must be secular, not religious, because secular reasons are accessible to everyone and so can justify the enforcement of morality's requirements, while religious reasons are only accessible to those in a particular religion. D. Ethics must be secular, not religious, because religion has no place in ethics.
A trainer working with business professionals urges that everyone should consciously try to apply their critical thinking skills to workplace problems
The trainer focuses on teaching how to analyze information, present well-reasoned arguments, and evaluate what others have to say in a fair-minded and respectful way. The trainer motivates the business professionals by telling them that they are not beginning from scratch and that they need strong critical thinking not only at work but in all the other aspects of their lives, whenever they need to decide in a reasoned and reflective way what to believe or what to do. Explain the trainer is correct. What will be an ideal response