How did the National Liberation Front justify its claim to represent the legitimate political, economic, and social aspirations of the people of South Vietnam as opposed to the legitimacy arguments of the anticommunist government of South Vietnam? Do you agree or disagree with the National Liberation Front's view as the legitimate representative of the goals of the South Vietnamese people? Explain your views with specific supporting arguments.
What will be an ideal response?
Answers may vary.
You might also like to view...
Describe the transportation revolution in the United States in the early nineteenth century
What will be an ideal response?
One important difference between China and Silla-dominated Korea was?
a. boy emperors b. queens c. foreign rulers d. eunuchs e. scholars
According to Thucydides, historian of the Peloponnesian War, what caused the war?
A) The Athenians sought control of the whole Mediterranean and wanted to force democracy upon it. B) The Persians sought vengeance on Athens. C) The Spartans were compelled to war because they feared the power of the Athenians. D) Sparta sought to maintain her position as the most powerful city-state of the Greek World. E) Democracy was forced upon cities that didn't want to be democratic.
One of the great political developments in England in the thirteenth century was
A) King John's success in bringing about a drastic reduction of the power of the nobility. B) the emergence of the English Parliament under Edward I. C) Edward I's successful unification of all the British Isles into a single feudal kingdom. D) the written recognition that the English monarchy should have absolute power. E) All of these are correct.