A state has enacted a new law. The new law states: “No person shall engage in communication while crossing a street.” Should a defendant charged with this crime after typing a text message while crossing the street assert that the statute is overly broad, vague, or both? Support your response with the argument that should be used on behalf of the defendant.
What will be an ideal response?
Students may respond that the law is overly broad, vague, or both. Students’ responses should provide a supportive argument. Sample response: The statute is overly broad. It could apply to people who are talking or waving as they cross the street, as acts such as these could be deemed to constitute communication. The statute is also vague. It does not provide sufficient information to detail the type of behavior that is punishable by law.
You might also like to view...
The lure of the measureable is when managers defer commitments as long as possible
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Which of the following is NOT true about the FBI?
a. The FBI was created by J. Edgar Hoover in 1908. b. The FBI was initially plagued with scandals but later grew to be a prominent law enforcement agency. c. The FBI is responsible for counterintelligence and antiradical investigations. d. The FBI is responsible for kidnappings.
Recent sociological studies have demonstrated that _____________.
A. employers are hesitant to hire young men who have been in prison. B. employers are more likely to do a background check on young African American men. C. young African American men are barred from many forms of employment. D. employers are both hesitant to hire young men who have been in prison and are more likely to do a background check on young African American men.
__________ is a sum of money that the offender must pay either to the victim or to a public fund for crime victims
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word