In Orkal Industries v. Array Connector, where Orkal bought parts from Array by sending an order form, but Array confirmed with its own form that contained different terms. Orkal did not object to the different terms until litigation arose later at which point the added terms mattered. The courts held that under the UCC:
a. the buyer, Orkal, controlled the terms, so the original order form controls
b. the buyer, Orkal, controlled the terms, so the original order form controls; Array could have forced a change by requiring Orkal to recognize its different terms, but it failed to do so
c. the seller, Array, controlled because Orkal did not object to the change in terms when the contract was formed
d. the seller, Array, controlled because under UCC 2-207, a sellers terms always control e. none of the other choices are correct
b
You might also like to view...
An asset's adjusted book basis and adjusted tax basis convey no information about the asset's fair market value.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Amaya works in the marketing department of a national clothing retailer
Amaya's job involves identifying customers who are most likely to generate profits for her company and communicating with those customers in meaningful ways that will encourage them to shop in her company's stores more frequently and to purchase more items during each visit to the store. Amaya's job focuses on ________. A) the physical function of marketing B) the sales orientation C) the production orientation D) perceived needs E) customer relationship management
In University of California v. Bakke, ________
a) reverse discrimination existed b) affirmative action plan amounted to a quota c) both d) neither
Under the UCC, a sale on consignment is regarded as a sale on approval
Indicate whether the statement is true or false